Hart ex rel. Hart v. Forbes
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
Plaintiff sought recovery of damages for personal injuries. Judgment was entered upon a jury verdict for defendant. The judgment is affirmed.
Plaintiff presents three points of error, alleging the trial court erred (1) by allowing improper argument of defendant; (2) by denying plaintiff’s reference to a dollar amount in the final portion of the closing argument; and (3) by restricting plaintiff’s voir dire examination.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Jayson Hart, a minor aged 5 years, was struck by an automobile driven by 17-year-old Catherine Forbes, whom…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Littell v. Bi-State Transit Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Goldstein v. FendelmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Votrain v. Illinois Terminal R. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Shaw v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Keller v. International Harvester Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Pfeffer v. KerrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- McMillin v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.