Legal Opinion

Hart ex rel. Hart v. Forbes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1982No. WD 32546PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

Plaintiff sought recovery of damages for personal injuries. Judgment was entered upon a jury verdict for defendant. The judgment is affirmed.

Plaintiff presents three points of error, alleging the trial court erred (1) by allowing improper argument of defendant; (2) by denying plaintiff’s reference to a dollar amount in the final portion of the closing argument; and (3) by restricting plaintiff’s voir dire examination.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Jayson Hart, a minor aged 5 years, was struck by an automobile driven by 17-year-old Catherine Forbes, whom…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Littell v. Bi-State Transit Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Goldstein v. FendelmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Votrain v. Illinois Terminal R. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Shaw v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Keller v. International Harvester Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Pfeffer v. KerrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. McMillin v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API