Legal Opinion

McMillin v. Union Electric Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1991No. WD 44222PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANNA, Judge.

A jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant finding the plaintiff 100% at fault. Plaintiffs appeal claiming the court erred by allowing defense counsel to inject insurance into the case during his voir dire questioning about the worker’s compensation claims of the panel and in not granting a mistrial after defendant’s counsel stated during his closing argument that the real defendant in the case was defendant’s employee, thereby inferring that Union Electric was not the defendant. We affirm.

Union Electric’s employee, Russell Barbour, drove a truck into the Tipton…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Pierce v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Vaeth Ex Rel. Vaeth v. GeggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Webb v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. Hammons v. EisertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Pollard v. WhitenerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Payne v. Fiesta Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Woods v. Friendly Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API