Legal Opinion

Chapman & Dewey Land Co. v. Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The judgment of the circuit court was correct, according to the principles of law decided in Brunson v. Board of Directors, 107 Ark. 24, 153 S. W. 828. In that case a landowner in a levee district made a payment of levee taxes under an illegal assessment, with knowledge of the fact, and it was held that the payment was voluntary and that the taxes could not be recovered. In that case, as here, if the landowner had refused payment of the improvement district taxes to the collector, the latter would have had no authority to sell the lands to enforce payment.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brunson v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Paschal v. MunseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. White River Lumber Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Worth v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. STATE DEPT. OF FIN. AND ADMIN. v. StatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Mertz v. PappasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Talbot, Auditor Pub. Accts. v. Charlton's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API