Legal Opinion
United States v. 175 Inwood Associates LLP.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 6, 2004No. 0:96-cv-01471PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
This is a civil action brought pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq. Section 107(a) of CERCLA allows the United States to move rapidly to respond to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances by permitting the government to spend monies from a “Superfund” established by Congress to finance the initial cost of such response actions. In relevant part, the United States brings this action against 175 Inwood Associates,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Rohm and Haas Company Rohm and Haas Delaware Valley, Inc. Chemical Properties, Inc. Bristol Township AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Picard v. Merkin (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Fritz v. Resurgent Capital Services, LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. P.R. Indus. Dev. Co.United States District Court · 2017
- United States v. BarlowDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- In Re FV Steel and Wire Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.