Legal Opinion

Felix v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1999PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, *448Kings County (Rappaport, J.), entered June 10, 1998, which denied its motion for partial summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages based upon the theory of design defect.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages based upon the theory of design defect is dismissed.

The plaintiff was injured while applying a quick-drying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Pigliavento v. Tyler Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adamo v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Militrano v. Lederle LaboratoriesNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Clinton v. Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. Cleary v. Reliance Fuel Oil Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Perez v. Radar RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API