Dwyer v. Harris
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
This is an action brought in 1939 on a note made in 1932 by the Danbury Hotel Company to the plaintiff, payable, three months after date, and indorsed by the defendant. A special defense pleaded the bar of the Statute of limitations. The plaintiff replied that the cause of action was renewed by the acknowledgment and new promises of the defendant; and that was the sole issue upon the trial to a jury. This appeal concerns only the legal adequacy of the trial judge’s instructions upon that point.
The finding, which is not attacked, shows that the plaintiff offered proof of the execution,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Potter v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Foster v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Sanford v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. ErratoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Buckley v. BuckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Viets v. MarksPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1942
- Viets v. MarksConnecticut Superior Court · 1942