Legal Opinion

Felt v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1907No. 1801PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by John G-. Felt against Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been caused by a change in the grade of a street and sidewalk in Salt Lake City. A judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed.

The facts involved in the transaction, and the questions presented on the appeal, are the same as were involved and presented in the cases of Kimball v. Salt Lake Gity, ante, p. 253, 90 Pac. '395, and Hempstead v. Balt Lake City, ante, p. 261, 90 Pac. 397. This case is therefore controlled by those cases.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed, with costs. Such is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hempstead v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Webber v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Coalter v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Gray v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Richards v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Salt Lake & U. R. v. ButterfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API