Legal Opinion

Webber v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1911No. 2251PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court; Third District; Hon. M, L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by Mary E. E. Webber against Salt Lake City. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

Despondent brought this action for the recovery of consequential damages, alleged to have been sustained to her premises abutting upon a public street in Salt Lake City. She alleges that the damages were caused by appellant in making a change in the grade of the street in front of her property. A trial to the court, without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment in favor of respondent, from which appellant prosecutes this appeal.

It is conceded on all sides that the appellant had the legal authority to make the improvement in the street; that it was properly made; and that the liability in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chase v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City Council of Montgomery v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. City of Atlanta v. HollidaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Tate v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Vanderhurst v. TholckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Strawberry Electric Service District v. Spanish Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Brooksbank v. Roane CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Coalter v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Gray v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API