Legal Opinion

SPRINGFIELD FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO. v. Biggs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1956No. 37124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Defendant in error instituted this action, as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover, under'an insurance policy with a “Windstorm and Hail Endorsement” attached, which the defendant company issued to him, a total of $510 as alleged damages to his house from windstorm and/or hail. $345 of this total was for damages to the house’s roof. The jury’s verdict was for the latter amount, and judgment was entered accordingly. The defendant insurance company has lodged this appeal. Our continued reference to the parties will be by their trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connecticut Fire Ins. v. HorneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. Bagwell v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Olson Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Insurance Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Cooper v. BooherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Cooper v. BooherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API