Legal Opinion
Gilpin v. Siebert
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 7, 2006No. CV05-427-STPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
On January 25, 2006, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (“F & R”) (#51) in the above-captioned case recommending defendants’ motion for summary judgment (#29) be denied in part and granted in part. No objections were filed.
The magistrate judge only makes recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The district court is not bound by the magistrate’s recommendations, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. Where objections have been made, I conduct a de novo review. 28…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012