Legal Opinion

Scanlan ex rel. Scanlan v. Eisenberg

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 15, 2012No. 09 C 5026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN F. GRADY, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of defendants Marshall Eisenberg, Earl Melamed, and Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP (collectively, the “lawyer defendants”) to dismiss Counts I, II, and III of the Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons explained below, the motion is. granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Mary Bucksbaum Scanlan (“Scanlan”) is the primary beneficiary of several discretionary trusts (the “Trusts”) that were established by her father and uncle, who were the' founders of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Geinosky v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuculich v. GrierDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  2. Juan Gallegos v. Weiler, Inc. and Altorfer, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  3. Nasrabadi v. KameliDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API