Heimberger v. Elliott Frog & Switch Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. W. J. N. Moyers, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.
1Per curiam
It is conceded by appellee that there is no proof in the record to sustain the first count of the declaration, and that the questions for us to decide now relate solely to the second count of the declaration, and the proof bearing thereon. The ground particularly relied on by appellant for the reversal of the judgment now is that the judgment is not sustained by the evidence. In addition to the facts already given in our statement above and in the said former opinion of this court, the evidence for the appellee in this record only discloses the following facts tending to show liability…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- North Chicago Street Railway Co. v. CottonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Houston v. Brush & CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Armour v. GolkowskaIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Olson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howard v. Chicago & Alton RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Orenstein v. Boston StoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913