SI Venture Holdings, LLC v. Catlin Specialty Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND1
This case presents an issue of first impression under New York law — -whether a contract that requires an insured party to seek approval from its insurer before expending funds for environmental clean-up is void as against public policy. The facts are .not in dispute. SI Venture Holdings (“SI”), a real estate development company, entered into an insurance contract with Catlin Specialty Insurance (“Catlin”) that included the following provision (“Consent Provision”):
The Insurer shall pay on behalf of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rivera v. Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- White v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lou Dibella and Dibella Entertainment, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Bernard Hopkins, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Vigilant Insurance v. Bear Stearns CompaniesNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Columbus Mckinnon Corp. v. Travelers Indem. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Saint-Jean v. Emigrant Mortg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Columbus Mckinnon Corp. v. Travelers Indem. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020