Chickasaw Loan & Trust Co. v. Mills
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Seminole County ; Tom I). McKeown, Judge. Action by the Chickasaw Loan & Trust Company against Eke Mills. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CLAY, C.
On the 1st day of November, 1911, plaintiff in error filed this suit in ejectment against defendant in error to recover the surplus allotment of defendant in Seminole county, Okla., and for damages, rents, and profits.
Defendant answered by general denial, and in his cross-petition sets up that he is a Seminole freedman and as such was allotted the N. E. ¼ of S. E. ¼ and S. E. ¼ of N. E. ¼ of section 31, township 9 N., range 7 E. I. M. in said county, and was allotted as his homestead the N. W. ¼ of the S. E. ¼ of section 31, township 9 N., range 7 E. I. M.; that there…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Steffian v. Milmo National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Marden v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Harkreader v. ClaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
- Stone v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baldridge v. SundaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Swindall v. Van School Dist. No. 53Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Harber v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Swindall v. Van School Dist. No. 53Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931