Great State Petroleum, Inc. v. Arrow Rig Service, Inc.

OPINION ON REHEARING

HOPKINS, Justice.

All three parties have filed motions for rehearing in this cause, asserting numerous “assignments” and points of error. On the same day this case was originally decided, the Texas Supreme Court altered its position in Pool v. Ford Motor Co., concerning the proper method of interpreting the wording of points of error challenging sufficiency of the evidence. 1 Therefore, we grant Great State’s motion for rehearing which contends, inter alia, that points of error four and five in Great State’s appellate brief raised challenges to the factual, and not the…