Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miklin Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2017No. 14-3099, 14-3211Published

1DissentKelly, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from Part II of the court’s opinion.

A

In 1953, the Supreme Court in Jefferson Standard created an exception from protection under Section 7 of the Act, introducing the concept that employees could be discharged “for cause” under Section 10(c) if they engaged in “disloyalty.” The court here concludes that Jefferson Standard set out an explicit test for determining disloyalty and asserts that the Board made an “error of law” by failing to apply the test properly. But Jefferson Standard did not set out a test to apply to determine whether an employer’s “cause for discharge”…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API