Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1903No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Hillsdale; Chester, J. Case by John "Wallace against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company for injury to a shipment of stock. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of negligence; the charge being that defendant; having undertaken to transport a car load of hogs from North Adams to Cleveland, neglected to use reasonable dispatch, and did not deliver them at the stockyards within a reasonable time, and neglected to water the hogs externally while in transit, although the necessity for so doing was known to defendant’s agents. It is charged that from the lack of such watering, and because of such neglect, a portion of the hogs died.

The testimony on the tidal tended to show that the car was shipped from North Adams at 6:49 p. m., and that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heller v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Metz Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GraysonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API