St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Copeland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washita County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by S. II. Copeland against the St. Louis & San Erancisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Negligence, question for jury: Wallace v. Lake-Shore & M. S. By. Co. (Mich.) 95 N. W. 750; Buppel v. Allegheny, etc., By. Co. (Penn. 46 Am. St. Rep. 666; 4 Cye. 437, note; Hutch. Carriers (3rd Ed.) 419; Wilson’s Rev. & Ann.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Washita County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by S. II. Copeland against the St. Louis & San Erancisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Negligence, question for jury: Wallace v. Lake-Shore & M. S. By. Co. (Mich.) 95 N. W. 750; Buppel v. Allegheny, etc., By. Co. (Penn. 46 Am. St. Rep. 666; 4 Cye. 437, note; Hutch. Carriers (3rd Ed.) 419; Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. § 706. Waiver of written request to unload cattle: Soper v. B. B. Co. (Mich.) 71 N. W. 853; Cleveland, etc., By. Co. v. Heath, 53 N. E. 198; Frisco v. Phillips (Olda.) 87…
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
This was an action for damages to certain live stock, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, in the district court of Washita county. The petition alleged in substance, that on the 10th day of August, 1904, for a valuable consideration, and according to a contract between the parties, partly in writing and partly oral, the plaintiff delivered to the defendant certain live stock to be shipped from the town of Eddy, Oklahoma., to the town of Cordell, Oída.; that said live stock consisted of 4 head of horses and 15 head of cattle,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Squire v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Sans Bois Coal Co. v. JanewaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Western Transportation Co. v. NewhallIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Michigan Central Railroad v. HaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SpearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Patterson v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.