Legal Opinion
Wolff v. Wolff
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1986PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reversing so much thereof as affirmed the injunction against plaintiff and any corporation of which he is a shareholder and, except as so modified, the order should be affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.
Plaintiff and his three siblings (the individual defendants) charged wrongdoing and misappropriation against each other in connection with their food and game vending machine business, Hot Coffee Vending Service, Inc. The court after trial rejected plaintiff’s claims of oppression, waste and breach of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- May's Furs & Ready-To-Wear, Inc. v. BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Humphrey v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- New York Trust Co. v. American Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by24 opinions
- Glenn v. Hoteltron Systems Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- American Baptist Churches of Metropolitan New York v. GallowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Whitney Holdings, Ltd. v. GivotovskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Bertoni v. CatucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.