Legal Opinion

Small v. Williams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 20, 1891PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Evidence. Agency. Practice. Charge of court. Before Judge Miller. Bibb superior court. April term, 1890. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Williams filed his bill in equity to set aside and cancel a mortgage and note given by him to Small, on the ground that they had been procured from him by duress and fraud. It seems that Williams’s son John, at the time of the transaction, was an agent or drummer for Small, and had lost some eight or nine hundred dollars of Small’s money at Reynolds, Georgia. He telegraphed his loss to Small, and Small employed Shackleford, a detective, to go to Reynolds and find the money or the thief. Shackleford and young Williams returned to Macon in the afternoon of the same day, and…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Jones v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Askew v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Emery v. Atlanta Real Estate ExchangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Richter v. Atlantic CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API