Legal Opinion

Gerald P. VanPatten v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2013No. 02S03-1205-CR-251PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

When a competent adult patient visits a doctor and provides the physician with a medical history intending to aid in then-diagnosis or treatment, we presume those statements are made truthfully because adults know that lying to one’s doctor risks misdiagnosis or mistreatment. Accordingly, the Rules of Evidence generally allow medical professionals to provide substantive testimony as to the statements then-patients make in the course of providing their medical history — even though that testimony would ordinarily be excluded as hearsay. When the patient is a young child,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. McClain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Derrick Weedman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Keith Hoglund v. Ron NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. State v. Kevin LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  4. Wiley W. Walters, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Alexander Holmes v. National Collegiate Student Loan TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API