Gerald P. VanPatten v. State of Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID, Justice.
When a competent adult patient visits a doctor and provides the physician with a medical history intending to aid in then-diagnosis or treatment, we presume those statements are made truthfully because adults know that lying to one’s doctor risks misdiagnosis or mistreatment. Accordingly, the Rules of Evidence generally allow medical professionals to provide substantive testimony as to the statements then-patients make in the course of providing their medical history — even though that testimony would ordinarily be excluded as hearsay. When the patient is a young child,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- McClain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Derrick Weedman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Keith Hoglund v. Ron NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- State v. Kevin LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- Wiley W. Walters, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Alexander Holmes v. National Collegiate Student Loan TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.