Legal Opinion

Frieders v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided December 15, 1937No. 2735Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Jtjstice Yantis

delivered the opinion of the court:

No apparent dispute exists as to the facts herein. Claimant, Peter J. Frieders, had been hired by the Division of Highways of Illinois to cut grass and weeds along the S. B. I. Highways in DuPage and Will Counties. He furnished his own team and mower, and went to such points as directed by bis superiors in the Highway Department. On October 10, 1934 he had been cutting grass along State Route No. 59 just south of the Will County line. Along this particular road he had a stretch of nine miles on both sides of the highway, and had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Munn v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Union Starch & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Shegart v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bloomington, Decatur & Champaign Railroad v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API