James H. Sewell, Doing Business Under the Fictitious Firm Name and Style of Burns Cuboid Company v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
240 F.2d 228
James H. SEWELL, doing business under the fictitious firm
name and style of Burns Cuboid Company, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 14354.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 16, 1956.
Maury, Larsen & Hunt, George R. Maury, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Dawkins, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Alvin L. Berman, Atty., F.T.C., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before POPE, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
1
Sewell, petitioner here, and respondent before the Federal Trade Commission, has…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific States Paper Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.