Legal Opinion

H. & R. Truck Leasing Corp. v. Allen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGokdon, J.

“There is no surer way to find out what parties meant, than to see what they have done. Self-interest stimulates the mind to activity, and sharpens its perspicacity.” Insurance Co. v. Dutcher (1877); 95 U. S. 269, 273, 24 L. Ed. 410.

Even though the written option is somewhat ambiguous, the conduct of the parties (or their counsel) in this case vigorously establishes that the parties intended to sell by the acre. During the entire negotiations there was never any discussion of a gross sales price. The parties may have individually calculated what the total expenditure or receipt would be, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Docter v. FurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Stadele v. ResnickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Central Auto Co. v. ReichertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  3. Huntoon v. CapozzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Smith v. OsbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Baldwin v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API