Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dawson v. Leavenworth City & Fort Leavenworth Water Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1914No. 19,186PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

In 1882 the city of Leavenworth, a city of the first class, granted a franchise to the defendant to use the streets, alleys and grounds of the city for the purpose of placing water pipes therein and to furnish the city and its inhabitants with water. The franchise was to continue for a period of twenty years, the city reserving the right after the expiration of that time to purchase the waterworks, with all extensions, rights and franchises belonging thereto. The franchise *228was accepted and the defendant erected its waterworks plant, and from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Marshall v. Wyandotte County Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. City of Emporia v. Emporia Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. City of Troy v. . United Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Service Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. City of Winfield v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Holton Creamery Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. City of Parsons v. Parsons Water Supply & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Welsbach Street Lighting Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API