Legal Opinion

Eder v. Northern Arizona Consolidated Fire District 1

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 19, 2020No. 3:19-cv-08101Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Wayne Eder, No. CV-19-08101-PCT-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Northern Arizona Consolidated Fire District #1, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue is Defendant Jake Rhoades’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 16 (Doc. 48, Mot.),1 to which Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. 54, Resp.) and Defendant filed 17 a Reply (Doc. 55, Reply). The Court finds these matters appropriate for resolution without 18 oral argument. See LRCiv 7.2(f). For the reasons that follow, the Court grants Defendant’s 19 Motion. 20 I.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API