Legal Opinion

(PS) Ferrantino v. Sacramento County Office of Education

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 3, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03063Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY FERRANTINO, No. 2:18-cv-3063 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Anthony Ferrantino is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, 19 therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and

28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1). Pending before the court are defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint 21 pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) or in the alternative for a more definitive statement pursuant to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.