Legal Opinion

Gutzeit v. Pennie

California Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1893No. 15261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion in the Supreme Court for a writ of supersedeas pending an appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Motion for a writ of supersedeas.

The plaintiff brought this action for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by one Palmer upon certain lands in Santa Clara County. After the execution of the mortgage, Palmer conveyed the property, and thereafter died. The defendants in the action are persons who have acquired an interest in the mortgaged premises under Palmer subsequent to the date of the mortgage. Palmer’s grantee made an agreement with the appellant, Radovich, for a conveyance of a portion of the mortgaged premises, under which Radovich entered into possession, and thereafter made a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Spence v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API