Legal Opinion

Office of Washoe County District Attorney v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2000No. 35125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In a case brought by the district attorney to enforce a Washington child support order in Nevada, the district court imposed NRCP 11 sanctions against the district attorney for failing to discontinue enforcement of the support order after the district court’s previous ruling that Washington had continuing exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate the arrearage amount.

The district attorney now contends that the NRCP 11 order is legally insufficient and that the district court misinterpreted existing law in concluding that NRCP 11 was violated. We conclude that the district court manifestly…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Wardleigh v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Albany v. Arcata Associates, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Marshall v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1992

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Goble v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Heying-Stampfli v. RoyleNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Ryan v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API