Wrigley v. Nottingham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
The defendants contend that their general demurrers to the petition should have been sustained for the reason that the allegations show that the acts on which the suit was brought were those of the corporation alone and not their personal deeds. The corporation was not joined as a party defendant. The defendants, all officers of the company, were sued in their individual capacities.
The petition alleges injury and damages through the defendants’ conduct in maliciously procuring a breach of the plaintiff’s contract by the corporation. Allegedly, the agreement had been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Burns v. HorkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Austin v. ApplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nottingham v. WrigleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- McElroy v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Campbell v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Moore v. BargeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Smith v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.