Legal Opinion

State v. Neeley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1985No. 20694, 20710PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants in these consolidated appeals filed motions for certificates of probable cause pursuant to Rule 27, Utah R.Crim.P. (U.C.A., 1953, § 77-35-27). The State opposes issuance of the certificates and requests an interpretation and clarification of the requisite procedures and grounds upon which this Court and the district courts will issue certificates of probable cause under Rule 27.

Rule 27 provides a two-step process for defendants in t seeking release on bond pending appeal from a criminal conviction. First, the defendant applies to the district court for a certificate of probable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanton Miller and Robert MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. MotlowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
  3. D'Aquino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Bridges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. State v. PappasUtah Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  2. Stewart v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Jensen v. SchwendimanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BorenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API