Legal Opinion

Wayne County Bar Ass'n v. Naumoff

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1996No. 95-2179PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

After reviewing the record, we adopt the board’s findings and conclusions. However, we note that we publicly reprimanded respondent on October 16, 1991, for charging an excessive fee. We, therefore, impose an actual suspension of six months on respondent and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KathmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. KathmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PavlikOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. CulbreathOhio Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API