Legal Opinion

Kinney v. North Memphis Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

It is conceded that the decree from which this appeal comes correctly recites the material facts out of which this litigation arises. They are as follows :

On January 10, 1920, John R. Hirschmann, being then the owner of two lots in the town of Lepanto, conveyed them, by separate deeds, to H. S. Portis. In each deed notes were given in part payment of the purchase money, and to secure the payment of these notes, $450 in one deed and $400 in the other, a vendor’s lien was reserved. These deeds were duly recorded February 2, 1920. On February 6, 1920, which was prior to the maturity of any of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Driver v. LacerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Hebert v. FellheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rockford Trust Company v. PurtellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Vance v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Neal v. BradleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API