Legal Opinion

Oelkrug v. Gilwaldron Realty Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 16, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs’ first and second causes of action for treble damages for willful overcharges of rent were actions for damages and not for a penalty (Di Bitetto v. Sussman, 279 App. Div. 1033) and should not have been dismissed for failure of the summons to contain an indorsement as required under section 24 of former New York City Municipal Court Code.

The third and fourth causes of action for malicious prosecution were sufficient as pleaded. Failure to include in the indorsement on the summons an allegation that defendant lacked probable cause to commence the criminal prosecutions was not a fatal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Di Bitetto v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holloway v. New York City Transit AuthorityCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API