Four Hundred & Twenty Min. Co. v. Bullion Min. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
1Opinion of the CourtSawxee, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts). Upon the facts shown by the bill of complaint, the defendant insists that the right to the 420 feet of the Comstock lode in question, and, consequently, the right to the patent, appears in the bill to have been once directly put in issue, in an action between the same parties fully litigated and determined in favor of the defendant; and that the matter is res adjudicata, and a bar to further litigation. On this ground it is claimed that the bill shows no equity. After a careful consideration of the acts of congress set out in the statement of the case, it is clear…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Sheldon v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Long v. DollarhideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Clink v. ThurstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Speer v. Board of County Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- O'Neil v. Wolcott Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.