Legal Opinion

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Pray

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1953No. 11735PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal by the Travelers Indemnity Company requires interpretation of an exception clause in an automobile liability insurance policy issued by it to Hubert T. Leibfarth, Jr., who owned a Pontiac automobile. Young Leibfarth’s father, for whom he was named, owned a Cadillac automobile which was insured in another company. While the son, accompanied by his father, was driving the latter’s Cadillac, they met with an accident in consequence of which both died and the appellee herein, Floyd J. Pray, was seriously injured.

Pray recovered judgment in the amount of $27,000…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
  4. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. Marshall v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Giokaris v. KincaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Leteff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API