Legal Opinion
Vincent v. Crane
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1903No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Gratiot; Stone, J. Summary proceedings by Dresser B. Vincent against Obid F. Crane to recover the possession of a farm. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 22d' of September, 1900, plaintiff leased to the defendant his farm of 200 acres for the term of two years, with the privilege. of three years, from the 1st of April, 1901, under a written lease, which contained the provision that, “in case any rent shall be due and unpaid, or if default shall be made in any of the covenants herein contained, then it shall be lawful for the party of the first part” to enter and repossess himself. The lease then proceeds as follows:
*701“And the said party of the second part does hereby hire the said premises for the term of two years as above mentioned, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kerrains v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Chatard v. O'DonovanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Milligan v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- McPheeters v. BirkholzMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Real Estate Stores, Inc. v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Whitlock v. BerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913