Legal Opinion

Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Reavis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 18, 1962No. 39231PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

1. Compliance with the thirty-day notice provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code § 114-303, is a necessary prerequisite to the payment of compensation. Where the only evidence of notice was that of a claimant who, having had a previous back injury for which compensation had been paid, and now claiming a further back injury testified: “[I] told Mr. Sticky [my supervisor] that I had to go to the doctor, I was hurting so in my back. And he asked me was this my old injury and I said, 'No, I didn’t think it was my old injury, I just had a hurting in it,’ and he gave me a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. CoulterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. Davison-Paxon Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Railway Express Agency Inc. v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Roddy v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Fountain v. Georgia Marble Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Dan River Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Consolidated Underwriters v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Farrow v. Carr Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Bryant v. J. C. Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Jackson v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API