Legal Opinion

Capianco v. Long-Term Disability Plan of Sponsor Uromed Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2007No. 05-56757PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Gil Capianco appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company on Capianco’s suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), for disability benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse on two of Capianco’s theories of recovery, affirm the district court’s judgment as to the rest of his theories, and remand for further proceedings.

As an initial matter, we hold that the district court was correct in reviewing Hartford’s decision under a de novo standard of review.1…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daniel Kunin v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Donald Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan Erisa PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Ernest E. Evans v. Safeco Life Insurance Company, Personal Security Option Program--Lockheed Special Accident Insurance Plan, Lockheed CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Jerry L. Engleson v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langlois v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API