Legal Opinion
Jaqua v. Woodbury
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1892No. 400PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From the Jay Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Crumpacker, J. —
The only question presented by the record relates to the sufficiency of the second paragraph of complaint upon demurrer. It is as follows:
“ Plaintiff further complains of said defendants, and says that on the 25th day of January, 1888, the defendants, using the names and styles aforesaid, executed their note, a copy of which is filed herewith and made part of this complaint, *290in which they promised to pay the sum of one hundred dollars, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws, and attorney’s fees, with six per cent, interest from date ; that twenty-five…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mercer v. HebertIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Crandall v. First National Bank of AuburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Cress v. HookIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Carper v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Booker v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by10 opinions
- Galusha v. WendtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Sampliner v. Motion Picture Patents Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Prosky v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Aetna Insurance v. StroutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.