United States v. Holcomb
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Darden, Judge:
In this case the object of the Court’s concern is with the closing sentence argument of defense counsel and with whether this argument conceded too much by its statement that the accused “doesn’t deserve another chance.”
A general court-martial found the appellant guilty of making and uttering eight worthless checks, two specifications of absence without leave, wrongfully wearing sergeant E-5 stripes, and eleven specifications of forgery. A sentence of dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard *310labor for two years is unchanged after…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WeatherfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. RichardsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. SchwartzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. MellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. VolmarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. McNallyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. LyonsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. WebbUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. BolkanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.