Legal Opinion

Morton and Ashcraft v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1944No. 4367PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Separate informations were filed against appellants, Morton and Ashcraft, each containing two counts, one count charging the crime of burglary, the other the crime of grand larceny. Over the objections and exceptions of appellants, the cases were consolidated and tried together. Appellants were found guilty on both counts, and verdicts of six years on one count, and twelve years on the other, were returned, and from the judgment pronounced upon these verdicts is this appeal.

We think it was error to have consolidated and tried these informations together, over the objections of appellants. Had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DolbowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Bennett and Holiman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Nolan and Guthrie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. McClellan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
  5. Graham and Seaman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. EdgmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Ashcraft v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Morton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Morton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API