Legal Opinion

McClellan v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from Pulashi Circuit Court. Hon. J. W. Martin, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Harrison, J.:

The. appellant Avas indicted in two eases for forgery, and also for uttering the forged instrument.

The indictment in the first case, after the caption, was as follows:

The Grand Jury of Pulaski County, in the name and by the authority of the State of Arkansas, accuse Carter McClellan of the crime of forgery, committed as follows, viz: The said Carter McClellan, on the 20th of July, 1876, in the county and State aforesaid, unlawfully contriving to defraud L. Valmer & Co., then and there did felonously forge a writing purporting to be an order of one Richard Hudgins, which forged…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892
  3. Agee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Laird v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Setzer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API