Legal Opinion
Adler v. Payward, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 24, 2020No. 19-3227-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19-3227-cv Adler v. Payward, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Carol Aurecchione v. Schoolman Transportation System, Inc., Classic Coach and Bill Schoolman, Docket No. 04-0561-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Tongkook America, Inc. v. Shipton Sportswear CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. AEP Power Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.