Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. P & H Cattle Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 28, 2006No. Civil Action 05-2001-DJWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) brings this contractual indemnity action to recover sums that it, as surety, expended in defending and settling a bond claim. Hartford issued the bond on behalf of Defendant P & H Cattle Company, Inc. (“P & H Cattle”) and the bond listed Defendant Tim Reece d/b/a Reece Cattle Company as “clearee.” Subsequent to the issuance of the bond, P & H Cattle, Emporia Livestock Sales, Inc., Olma V. Peak, and Velma Peak (collectively the “Peak Indemnity Defendants”) executed a General…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc. v. Locus Telecommunication, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Amador v. Law Offices of Kirk A Cullimore, TheDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Goran, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Goran, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- G.W. Van Keppel Company v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.