Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zeitlen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1987No. 00564PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for violations of conditions of probation. Appellant contends that the lower court erred in (1) admitting testimony that violated the physician-patient privilege; (2) failing to state on the record its reasons for the sentence imposed; (3) finding that the Commonwealth had met its burden of proof that he had violated the terms of his probation; and (4) admitting hearsay evidence. For the reasons that follow we order appellant to supplement his brief to address our Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki, 513 Pa.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DrumgooleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. LoveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. PenrodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. OsteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API