Houck v. Eastchester Public Utility District
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA; District Judge.
'The plaintiffs in the foregoing class actions; as residents and taxpayers, seek to enjoin the- collection of taxes levied on real and personal property and the sale thereof to satisfy the tax liens, and to obtain a refund of the taxes already paid, on the ground of invalidity of the levies.
The defendant public utility districts were organized under Sec. 49-2-1 et seq., A.C.L.A.1949. Sec; 49-2-21, as atñendéd by Chap. 21, S.L.A.1951, empowers such districts to construct, maintain and operate dams, reservoirs, powerhouses, power structures, transmission lines, waterworks,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. People ex rel. SelbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Cahill v. PerrineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Indiana Truck Farm Co. v. Town of SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- New Albany Woolen Mills v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curtis Publishing Company v. Wallace Butts, Wallace Butts v. Curtis Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- In Re Mountain View Public Utility District No. 1Alaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Wood v. GrayAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Curtis Publishing Company v. Wallace Butts, Wallace Butts v. Curtis Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965