Legal Opinion

Nilsson v. McDole

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1913No. 10929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Columbia county, Neill, J., entered September 2, 1912, upon a verdict of a jury rendered in favor of one of the defendants, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

The plaintiff brought this- action to recover upon three separate bills for goods, wares and merchandise alleged to have been sold to the defendants as a copartnership. Two of these bills were assigned to the plaintiff. The complaint alleged that the defendants were copartners in the years 1910 and 1911, at the time the goods were so sold to them. It is also alleged that the goods so sold were of the reasonable value of $590.42, no part of which has been paid. The defendants answered separately. O. W. McDole admitted the purchase of the goods upon his personal account and denied the value as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Akers v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Alaska Banking & Safe Deposit Co. v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caswell v. Maplewood GarageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  2. Tennant v. F. C. Whitney & SonsWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API