Terrien v. Zwit
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentKelly, J.
I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusions. The analysis characterizing the operation of family day-care homes as a commercial use is conclusory, providing an unworkable standard for determining whether future uses are residential or commercial. Additionally, the opinion all but eviscerates the public policy doctrine long recognized in this state’s case law.
I would hold that the family day-care homes involved here are residential in nature and do not violate restrictive covenants prohibiting commercial and business use. I would hold also that the covenants prohibiting the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- McNamara v. GargettMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Skutt v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. Paulist Fathers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.