Legal Opinion

Wehrman v. Moore

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 26, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Lirm District Court. — J. T. Moffit, Judge. Litigation was had in the district court of Linn County, resulting in decree that appellee Heins had the lien of a pledgee on certain property claimed by the plaintiff. The decree fixed the amount for which the lien was established and might be foreclosed. Heins was proceeding to foreclose. Thereupon, the plaintiffs and the intervener perfected an appeal from said decree.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Lirm District Court. — J. T. Moffit, Judge. Litigation was had in the district court of Linn County, resulting in decree that appellee Heins had the lien of a pledgee on certain property claimed by the plaintiff. The decree fixed the amount for which the lien was established and might be foreclosed. Heins was proceeding to foreclose. Thereupon, the plaintiffs and the intervener perfected an appeal from said decree. Pending appeal, application was made to Benjamin I. Salinger, as judge of the Supreme Court of Iowa, to restrain Heins from thus proceeding, and to compel him, upon…

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

ap?" of iitigatedale ehaserpricein escrow. • I. The intervener has dismissed his appeal. It is idle to go into the question of his motives for doing so. On the face of the,record, an appeal remains on part of Wehrman and Trueblood. It appears from the record made on the granting of said order that one question involved is whether the award to Heins does not include some $1,400 usury. While Wehrman and True-blood have sold to Grossman, $4,000 of the purchase price is in escrow, awaiting final determination of this appeal. Notwithstanding the dismissal by Grossman, then, plaintiffs have the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Manning v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Norris v. TrippSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Allison v. CorsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  5. Ex Parte the Milwaukee Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Carr v. CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Garland v. TanksleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. In Re Lamm's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. Joyner v. HammondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API